This is a partial list of cases that were awarded damages by the US Government via the “Vaccine Court”, which is a federal court of claims for the FLU VACCINE. Note the number of deaths, in just 2012.

All vaccine claims are managed and adjudicated by the congressionally-created Office of Special Masters. Many of these decisions include the stipulation that the Respondent (the government) “denies injury/death was caused-in-fact by vaccination, nonetheless, the parties agreed informally to resolve this matter.”

Vaccine Program/Office of Special Masters | US Court of Federal …

Stipulation; trivalent influenza vaccine ; Guillain-Barre Syndrome DARRYL ALDRICH, August 31, 2012

Stipulation; trivalent influenza vaccine ; Guillain-Barre Syndrome DARRYL ALDRICH, August 31, 2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine ; GBS RAY SIZEMORE, August 27, 2012

Stipulation; Influenza ; Neuropathy; Myelopathy H.G. 08/27/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine; Acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis PAMELA A. GOUDGE, as Parent and Legal Representative of her Minor Daughter, MEGAN ELIZABETH GOUDGE 08/17/2012

Decision by Stipulation; Influenza Vaccine ; Encephalopathy, ADEM, Brain Lesions LEE HAMES 08/16/2012

Decision by Stipulation; Influenza Vaccine ; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS); CIDP DEBORAH E. BRADLEY 08/16/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Miller Fisher Variant of GBS; Flu Vaccine TERRIE EAST 08/01/2012

Joint Stipulation on Damages; Trivalent Influenza – Flu Vaccine ; Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS).DESSA STABOLESKI 07/31/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine ; Acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis Stipulation; Trivalent influenza vaccine, flu; Guillain-Barré Syndrome, GBS THERESA LYNCH 07/24/2012

Influenza vaccine , flu; Guillain-Barré Syndrome, GBS; Stipulation RICHARD D. HUMMEL 07/24/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine ; Encephalomyeloneuropathy LAURA LARUE 07/12/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine ; Allergic Reaction; Progressive URI DWIGHT MUNGER 07/12/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine; generalized itching. PATRICIA MORROW 07/11/2012

Stipulation; Influenza; CIDP JAMES JIM KINDELL 07/09/2012

Stipulation; influenza vaccine ; Guillain-Barre syndrome. MONA MENKING 07/09/2012

Stipulation; influenza vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome DANIEL IRWIN 07/06/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine ; transverse myelitis (TM) ARTHUR W. ASKEW 06/29/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine, flu ; Ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest PAUL L. CLEARY 06/28/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine ; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) THOMAS KIEF 06/28/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine ; neurological abnormalities; transverse myelitis (TM) LISA BURRELL 06/28/2012

Stipulation; influenza vaccine ; transverse myelitis CAROL LYNNE GOERNER 06/25/2012

Stipulation; trivalent influenza vaccine; acute hearing loss; vertigo. JOSEPH MAUS 06/22/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine , flu; Transverse myelitis, TM RICHARD PETRAGLIA 06/01/2012

Ruling on the record; trivalent (flu) vaccine ; acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)? JESSICA MURA (healthy 21-year old Emergency Medical Technician) 05/30/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine, flu; Rhomboencephalitis; Dysautonomia; Attorney fees and costs JAY D. PRIEFERT 05/18/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine; GBS; DEATH Death Estate of DRAGO POTOCIC, 05/15/2012

Stipulation; Influenza ; GBS PAMELA KWIATKOWSKI 05/15/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine; GBS; DEATH Estate of DEBORA KAY STEELEY, 05/08/2012

Stipulation; Influenza; GBS GARY C. STEBNITZ 05/01/2012

Stipulation; Influenza; GBS CRYSTAL L. RHODES 04/26/2012

Stipulation; CIDP; influenza DENIS LOUIS 04/18/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine GBS; Attorney Fees & Costs

Decision Based on Stipulation MARY L. JONES 04/18/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine ; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) ELIZABETH JASNOSZ 04/16/2012

Decision on the Record; Urticarial Vasculitis; Influenza AUDREY MCELROY 04/13/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine, flu; Guillain-Barré Syndrome, GBS; Attorney fees and costs minor child, JUAN SANCHEZ 3/13/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine; syncope; allergic reaction; orthostatic hypotension JESSICA JONES 03/12/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS); attorney fees and costs; award in the amount to which respondent does not object MERRELL S.McILWAIN 03/08/2012

Stipulation; influenza vaccine; Guillain Barre Syndrome MOSCA FLINT 03/02/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine; ADEM; DEATH Attorney Fees & Costs Decision Based on Stipulation Estate of, SEAN WEISSE 02/29/2012

Stipulation; Guillain-Barré Syndrome, GBS; Influenza vaccine, flu; Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis, Tdap MEGAN BAUER 02/29/2012

Proffer; Influenza vaccine, flu; Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, ADEM THURMAN DANIELS 02/16/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine GBS DAVID JOSEPH POLCIK 02/02/2012

Stipulation; Influenza (flu) vaccine ; Guillian-Barre Syndrome (GBS) DAN SMITH 02/02/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine; Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis; Urticaria Parents and Natural Guardians of minor DENNIS J. FLANAGAN 01/30/2012

Stipulation; Influenza vaccine, flu; Guillain-Barré Syndrome, GBS DOMINGO MARTINEZ 01/30/2012

Decision by stipulation; Influenza Vaccine ; Guillain Barre Syndrome JOHN HICKMAN, 01/27/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine; GB TAMY T. NGUYEN 1/27/12

Decision by stipulation; Influenza Vaccine ; Guillain Barre Syndrome CHRISTOPHER COALE, 01/24/2012

Flu vaccine; cytokine storm; DEATH of 82-year-old man six days after vaccination; sepsis/systemic inflammatory response; Zatuchni; pain and suffering of decedent pre-filing of petition Estate of EDGAR BRAGG, 01/18/2012

Decision by Stipulation; Influenza, Tdap and MMR; Shoulder Pain; Numbness and Dysfunction WALTER GROSH, 01/17/2012

Decision by Stipulation; Influenza, Tdap and Menningococcal Vaccines; Transverse Myelitis Peter Cieszewski . 01/13/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS); DEATH death Estate of CHARLES JAMES BUSALACCHI, 01/10/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine ; pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV); Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS FRUTO SOTO, 01/12/2012

Stipulation; influenza (flu) vaccine right deltoid cellulitis; serum sickness; connective tissue disorder; rheumatoid arthritis; Sjogren’s syndrome; autoimmune hepatitis; fibromyalgia KARON MERRILL, 01/10/2012

Stipulation; Influenza; GBS DEATH Estate of GUADALUPE G. GONZALEZ, 01/09/2012

Damages Decision Based on Stipulation; Flu Vaccine; GBS; Attorney Fees and Costs Decision Based on Stipulation GUILLERMINA RAMIREZ, 01/05/2012

Stipulation; influenza vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome DEATH Estate of REX KIMBELL 01/05/2012

Flu Vaccine ; Guillain-Barre-Syndrome (GBS);Stipulation of damages; Award and attorney’s fees MARGARET CLANT 01/05/2012

Stipulation; trivalent influenza vaccination ; acute-disseminated encephalomyelitis JUANITA SPARROW 01/04/2012

This is the full statement from Andrew Wakefield, the discredited doctor whose Lancet article sparked the MMR scare 15 years ago, on the outbreak of measles in Wales.

In the wake of further media distortion, misrepresentation, and ignorance in relation to the measles outbreak in Wales, it is important to clarify some key facts.In 1998, following an analysis of all published pre-licensing studies of MMR vaccine safety I recommended the use of single measles vaccine in preference to MMR. This remains my position.

At that time, in contrast with the false assertions of many commentators, including Richard Horton, Editor of The Lancet, and vaccine millionaire Paul Offit, the single vaccines were licensed in the UK and freely available to the British public.

While MMR vaccination uptake fell from February 1998, there was a reciprocal increase in the uptake of the single vaccines – a fact that is never acknowledged in the press. Vaccination clinics administered many thousands of doses of measles vaccine and children were “protected”.

Six months later, in September 1998, the British government withdrew the importation licence for the single vaccines, effectively blocking this option  for parents.

Measles cases in the UK rose when the government withdrew the importation licence for the single measles vaccine leaving concerned parents with no choice. When I demanded to know why, if the government’s principal concern was to protect children from measles, it would prevent parents with genuine safety concerns over MMR from  protecting their children, Elizabeth Miller of the Health Protection Agency responded, “…if we allowed parents the choice of single measles vaccines it would destroy our MMR programme.” The government’s concern appeared to be to protect the MMR programme over and above the protection of children.

Despite the claim of David Salisbury, head of the UK’s Immunisation Division, that MMR has, “an exemplary safety record”, two of the three brands introduced in 1988 had to be withdrawn for safety reasons – they caused meningitis.

Government officials had approved these dangerous vaccines – Pluserix and Immravax – giving them the great majority of the UK market despite knowing that they were high risk and despite having been warned explicitly of their dangers. These government officials put price before children’s health and have been seeking to cover up this shameful fact ever since.

The US government has paid out millions of dollars to children whose autism followed vaccine-induced brain damage.  A recent government concession in the US Vaccine Court confirms that the parents’ claims were valid all along. In a recently published December 13, 2012 vaccine court ruling, hundreds of thousands of dollars were awarded to Ryan Mojabi, whose parents described how “MMR vaccinations”, caused a “severe and debilitating injury to his brain, diagnosed as Autism Spectrum Disorder [‘ASD’]”.

Later the same month, the government suffered a second major defeat when young Emily Moller from Houston won compensation following vaccine-related brain injury that, once again, involved MMR and resulted in autism.

The cases follows similar successful petitions in the Italian and US courts (including Hannah Poling, Bailey Banks, Misty Hyatt, Kienan Freeman, Valentio Bocca, and Julia Grimes) in which the governments conceded or the court ruled that vaccines had caused brain injury. In turn, this injury led to an ASD diagnosis. MMR vaccine was the common denominator in these cases.

The more light that shone on this subject by way of informed, balanced debate, the better. I am offering to debate any serious challenger on MMR vaccine safety and the role of MMR in autism, live, in public, and televised

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/full-statement-by-mmr-scare-doctor-andrew-wakefield-the-government-has-tried-to-cover-up-putting-price-before-childrens-health-8570596.html

During a consultation today, with the wife of a lovely couple I treat long distance, she inquired as to what was was happening on the teaching front etc, (they ALWAYS ask, being keen homoeopathic mindedpeople themselves) I mentioned that the Spanish seminars were being prepared and that I had a lovely new projector to take over there for the videos, powerpoints, cases etc… and I was immediately instructed to accept a donation towards the cost of the projector!

Kindness always touches me. And to Marcia and Ed, you touched me. On behalf of the future students who will benefit from the presentations, I thank you muchly.

According to new reports, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-backed scientists in both the United States and Great Britain have jointly developed a computerized global monitoring system capable of tracking all social media activity around the world that defies mainstream vaccine dogma, and reporting it directly to authorities.

This brave new exercise in multinational, Big Brother spying is being hailed as a solution to the rapid spread of so-called “rumors” and “lies” about vaccines via the internet, which basically constitute any online free speech that questions the safety or effectiveness of vaccines. According to mainstream authorities, vaccines are completely safe and effective in every way, and anything that defies this unsubstantiated proclamation is now officially considered to be misinformation by the global police state.

According to Heidi Larson from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the U.K., and author of the new tracking system, free speech on the internet has “speeded up the global spread” of what she and others consider to be “unchecked rumors and misinformation about vaccines.” People thinking for themselves, in other words, and discussing legitimate vaccine safety concerns with others online is a threat to the establishment, thus the need for a virtual all-seeing eye, of sorts, to monitor all this chatter and report it directly to health officials.

Bill Gates, vaccine industry desperately trying to maintain vaccine myth through intimidation

The real motivation behind the development of this new tracking tool, of course, is to increase vaccine compliance by intimidating people into silence. Since the Gates Foundation-backed vaccine pushers do not have the capacity to completely prohibit online free speech as it pertains to vaccines (at least not yet), they are instead resorting to underhanded intimidation and manipulation tactics that they hope will give them a new platform to spread their propaganda more quickly and thwart efforts that defy the vaccine status quo.

This is all openly admitted by those who developed the new tracking platform using Gates Foundation funds, and it speaks for itself as to the true intentions of this sadistic cohort. An increasing number of people, for good reason, are avoiding vaccines, as study after study shows them to be toxic and largely ineffective. In fact, vaccines have been shown to be the cause of disease outbreaks, not the solution to them as claimed by Larson and others. So to stem this massive departure, the vaccine industry is seeking new ways to embed itself in the global discussion on vaccines in order to convince more people to get them.

Just in case you were wondering, virtually all of the disease outbreaks in recent years that authorities claim were caused by unvaccinated individuals were actually most prominent among the vaccinated. In other words, the data shows that vaccinated individuals are actually more likely to contract diseases like mumps, measles, and polio than are children who have not been vaccinated, which completely debunks the myths that vaccines “save lives,” and that not getting vaccinated puts one’s health at serious risk.

These provings were carried out by members of  Hahnemann’s Provers Union – which I’ll write more about in a future post – and also included some material from poisoning reports from older sources, all documented carefully by Hahnemann in this work.  Some  clinical and curative symptoms are also included.

The proving of Nux Vomica consists of 1301 symptoms.

In terms of the number of symptoms in each section, stomach and abdominal symptoms lead the field, with a whopping 169 symptoms, 22 of them presented in bold type which indicated the frequency and certainty of the symptom amongst the provers (and not as commonly believed, the intensity).

Interestingly, the next in line is the lower extremities section, with 107 symptoms, 8 of them in bold.  And a further interesting twist is that the bold symptoms constitute approx. 13% in the main stomach abdominal section, but they also form 13% of the mind and emotional section, which itself contains 75 symptoms.

We know that patients requiring Nux Vomica are often very sensitive to external inputs, and more or less anything can irritate and aggravate them.  The proving symptoms highlight the aggravation such patients experience during and after walking in the open air, eating, and in the morning to name a few.  The Nux headaches are well represented, as is to be expected, with 76 symptoms, 11% of them in bold.

Can the Nux patient feel better – ever?  From anything?  The proving shows that there are a few little things that can help the Nux patient, such as stretching, sitting quietly, resting, and sometimes from lying down.

There is a tendency to see patients requiring Nux as driving, forceful personalities, workaholics to the detriment of their personal lives and their health.  The mental-emotional picture presented in the proving is – as to be expected – more complex than that.  Although Hahnemann himself states that “it is more frequently required by those persons who are of an anxious, zealous, fiery, hot temperament, or of a malicious, wicked, irascible disposition”, we can also see deep sadness, irresolution, laziness and lack of desire to work from the proving symptoms.  There are those who say that people who are apparently lazy and avoid large projects and ambitious activities are actually perfectionists, who are convinced that they can’t do the thing properly and therefore avoid doing it at all.  From the proving it seems very possible that those people can also fall into the Nux-Vomica orbit, and this should be taken into consideration.

http://pandwisrael.wordpress.com/

The associates of P & W have been working on various projects. Of late, it is our opinion that we need to concentrate on teaching the use of the Therapeutic Pocket Book to practitioners. Whilst it is a smallish repertory, it requires some knowledge of the structure, and an understanding of the rubric meanings in order to make defined and accurate prescriptions in daily use.

To this end, Vera in Israel, Guillermo in Mexico and Gary in Europe have been conducting workshops and offer Seminars and teaching based around the writings of Samuel Hahnemann with the focus on clinical therapeutics utilising the Therapeutic Pocket book by Boenninghausen.

Venues and dates:

• Israel. Week of 26th May. 2013
• Mallorca June. 2 day teaching seminar in Mallorca (no available places left) 2013
• Bilbao Spain, 2 day Seminar in English. September or October (2013)
• Bilbao Spain, 2 day Seminar in Spanish. September or October (2013) Dates to be finalised.

If you would like to discuss a teaching arrangement in Europe, Mexico or Israel, you can contact us at seminars@garyweaver.org

The Centers for Disease Control has been quietly rolling out a nationwide program called the Immunization Information Systems (IIS), registering your vaccine information into a database. [1] This effort has been run in parallel with state vaccine registry implementations.

What is the intention of such programs?

My colleague Leslie Manookian, writer and director of the movie The Greater Good, wrote in a recent article, the “CDC has openly stated that vaccine registries are a tool to identify areas of ‘undervaccination’ so that they can be ‘addressed’ and brought into ‘compliance.’” [2]

I would also add to Leslie’s statement that since the government purchases a large bulk of the vaccines (for example, the Vaccines for Children program), it is in their financial interest to make sure vaccines are consumed regularly.

If you exempt your child from being vaccinated, your refusal is also being tracked and put into the database. If you want to know why this is a big deal, read on.

But first, what does tracking every vaccine you or your children have ever been injected with look like?

Big Plans for You

I want to make this very real for you.

The government collects information on who vaccinates their children and who does not. They know how many children have had their vaccines. They also know how many children have opted out of being vaccinated. They have the data.

The government has big plans and the most outrageous part about this entire scheme is you don’t have a choice – your data is entered. In order to accomplish this task we have to answer 3 basic questions.

1. What data is being tracked?

2. Who has access to the tracked data?

3. What will be done with this data?

Let’s start with the first question of what is being tracked.

Question #1: What Data is Being Tracked?

You’ll be surprised at how much data is being tracked. Some of the data is required while other data sets are optional. Rest assured, what is optional today can become required in short order.

According to the Immunization Information System Functional Standards, 2013 – 2017, the following information will be in their databases: [3]

• REQUIRED: Patient name: first, middle, last
  
• Optional: Patient alias name: first, middle, last
• Optional: Patient address, phone number
• Optional: Birthing facility
• Optional: Patient Social Security number (SSN)
• REQUIRED: Patient birth date
  
• REQUIRED: Patient sex
  
• REQUIRED: Patient race
  
• REQUIRED: Patient ethnicity
  
• Optional: Patient Primary language
• REQUIRED: Patient birth order
  
• Optional: Patient birth registration number
• REQUIRED: Patient birth State/country
• Optional: Patient Medicaid number Optional
• REQUIRED: Mother’s name: First, middle, last, maiden
• Optional: Mother’s SSN
• Optional: Father’s name: first, middle, last
• Optional: Father’s SSN
• REQUIRED: Vaccine Type
  
• REQUIRED: Vaccine Manufacturer
  
• Optional: Vaccine dose number
• Optional: Vaccine expiration date
• Optional: Vaccine injection site
• REQUIRED: Vaccination date
• REQUIRED: Vaccine lot number
• Optional: Vaccine provider

Do you trust anyone with your personal information? This leads us to the next question …

Question #2: Who Has Access to the Tracked Data?

This is where the language should have you a little concerned because it is extremely vague.

According to the Immunization Information System documentation, data can be provided to “healthcare providers, public health, and other authorized stakeholders.”

It goes on to say schools, child care, and child camps may also have access to the records.

One of the major areas the lawmakers neglected to mention was the power granted to your employer. Consider the fact this past year nurses were actually being fired for not having their flu shot, as reported by Natural News. [4] Imagine if the proper pressure were applied to businesses to meet a government mandate. They would be given access to these records. It’s something for you to chew on.

That brings us to our last question…

Question #3: What Will Be Done with This Data?

The Centers for Disease Control’s goal is to get 95% or greater vaccine compliance. How is this accomplished?

In the short term, if your child is not vaccinated or is behind schedule, expect phone calls, emails, and personal visits from local health authorities. One function of the CDC’s Immunization Information System is to “forecast” vaccines due, past due, or coming due.

When these tactics don’t work or are ignored, expect more a more confrontational strategy. Keep in mind what happened on Christmas Eve 2009.

The U.S. Senate passed H.R. 3590. The bill eventually became Public Law No. 111-148, which gives the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) authorization to create “vaccination squads” in local communities and seek out unvaccinated children. The “vaccine squads” are called the Community Preventive Services Task Force. [5]

Not only will the Task Force be working with the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, but on page 1202 of that law, the most relevant responsibilities are listed as:

“(D) carrying out immunization-promoting strategies for participants or clients of public programs, including assessments of immunization status, referrals to health care providers, education, provision [provide] of on-site immunizations, or incentives for immunization;

“(E) providing for home visits that promote immunization through education, assessments of need, referrals, provision of immunizations, or other services;”

“(F) providing reminders or recalls for immunization providers;”

“(G) conducting assessments of, and providing feedback to, immunization providers;”

“(H) any combination of one or more interventions described in this paragraph; or”

“(I) immunization information systems to allow all States to have electronic databases for immunization records.”

Conclusion

The Public Law exclusively states exactly where the data will come from – the Immunization Information Systems. Can you imagine police or sheriffs escorting the vaccine squad(s) for “non-compliant” parents?

At this point, I really can’t put it past them.

Consequently, once this system is completely operational, the sky is the limit. Big Brother has the capability to track more than just vaccines. You can anticipate finding just about any pharmaceutical drug mandated by the government in this same system.

The question then becomes, who influences the government agencies mandating vaccines?

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” – Lord Acton

References

1. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/about.html
2. http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/news-views/vaccine-registries-whats-all-the-fuss/
3. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/func-stds.pdf
4. http://www.naturalnews.com/037544_healthcare_workers_flu_shots_colorado.html
5. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf

***************

We are looking at a final 2013 date for September October or November depending on numbers and requirements. The minimum attendees for the end of the year is 8 and maximum is 50. As soon as we know the approx numbers we can book the appropriate venue for the Seminar.

Many people visiting the island, book a week or two weeks holiday with their family and then attend the function and still have time for relaxation and a rest after.

**************

The language the seminar will be conducted in will be English. We will be presenting many case examples and presentations to show Hahnemanns methodology.

**************

After several private training sessions with solo practitioners, We have decided to offer a group training in the Hahnemannian/Boenninghausen methodology, which is the most successful application of the therapy in the world.

P & W have researched the works of Boenninghausen and Hahnemann for over 11 years, and have produced a computerised repertory in 4 languages based on the original 1846 German edition, which has been meticulously corrected and completely retranslated in the English, Spanish and Hebrew languages. The work, which took 4 years to complete, uses the original layout of Boenninghausen, and therefor is familiar to students who use Allens version. Each rubric has been carefully checked for language meaning in the 18th/19th century, and amended carefully to represent the original intent of the author for description of a disease or eruption or location.

Modern students of homoeopathy have not been exposed to the accuracy of this repertory. Once the key symptoms are noted, the choices of medicines are indicated with absolute certainty, and a brief read of the Materia Medica will determine the final choice for prescription.

The repertory is easy to use. The methodology takes a little practice.  We have honed a practitioner training course to 3 days, from which the basics and methodology will be fully inculcated in the receptive physician.

The teaching will include the following points among many others:

• What we are looking for in disease.(According to Hahnemann)
• What symptoms are important.
• How to isolate key symptoms.
• How to find the pivotal symptoms in totality.
• What totality means.
• How to track the disease/medicinal progress and when to change medicine.
• How to evaluate progress
• When to repeat a dose
• When to wait on a dose, and why.
• When to finish treatment
• How to use the repertory with confidence.
• How to reduce consultation times by getting the necessary prescribing information quickly, and eliminating the spurious questions.
• How to use the Materia Medica.

A 3 day Seminar is being planned for the latter end of the year (2013) to be held in Mallorca. The location was chosen for ease of access for European attendees, and relative inexpensiveness of accommodation.

The Seminar cost, depending on numbers, will include Water, Tea and Coffee.

All meals, travel costs, accommodation etc, is the responsibility of the student. We estimate that Seminar costs for 3 days will be in the region of €450-€500 depending on numbers. Depending on numbers, we will try and keep the Seminar in the Palma region for ease of getting to.

Example costs to the Island. A week in Mallorca in October can be as low as €250 including flights

If you are interested in the Seminar, Please drop an email to gw@boenrep.com

More details will follow in due course.

Post Vaccination – Vaccine Targeted Strain – Viral and Bacterial Pathogen – Shedding

So how much of this said claim is truth and real, and/or not real? Do we know? A search for the evidence.

First of all, let me ask this. Why is it, that when the conclusions of actually peer reviewed studies are not in your favor as to the intended agenda bias, that even endless peer reviewed studies are not enough to get pro-vaccine people to take a look at and even read a single one of those studies; yet when there are limited to little to no existing peer reviewed studies, that they are jumping all over with demands to produce a peer reviewed study, to make such as any certain such as a vax-truth opposing persons point of contention, that has expressed?

In regard to vaccines lets go to the issue of vaccine shedding, and ask the question as to can and do any of the current vaccines shed the pathogen in a way that could make a non vaccinated person susceptible to acquiring the illness from a vaccinated person. There are in Pubmed several but limited studies that address the shedding issue as to in regard to the various vaccines. Just use the search terms vaccine shedding Pubmed, and will you several but as said limited numbers references in the google listing, and then you can go to pubmed itself, which is somewhat as well limited for available references as to claiming one way or the other. As for the measles vaccine, one Pubmed reference stated that it the vaccine could shed for up to three days. Certainly long enough to infect another individual.

So, actually and possibly no one really nor likely knows for sure what the complete truth is on this issue. It would seem to be common sense that the vaccine makers surely do not and would not want to know if their vaccine causes shedding or not; nor to find out. So then who would actually fund theses said studies. I think with what I read and reviewed in regard to vaccine shedding, just getting into even the beginning phase of the studies, tells me that vaccines do have a potential to shed irregardless of being bacterial or viral; which very well could be an obvious risk to the unvaccinated. I mean good grief, the existing studies clearly point to the push to vaccinate everyone due to the risk of shedding possibility. What more evidence would you need of the risk of the vaccinated, to the unvaccinated? And yet the pro-vaccine side wants to claim to just the opposite; and that it is only the vaccinated that are at risk from the unvaccinated??? You know accused again of reducing the vaccine derived herd immunity; even though the schools most often even today have no more than a 5% or less rate of existing school exemptions?  We as well by the way are not are NOT just talking about the oral polio vaccine, here. They clearly know that the oral polio vaccine sheds and can as well cause numerous cases of AFP in the underdeveloped and unsanitary for conditions countries, that the oral polio vaccine is still used to day. They know of the identified mutations in the polio vaccine virus that the the said oral vaccine has very likely as well caused. if they have an alternative explanation, I have yet to hear and or read about it.

So, let me ask you, have vaccines eradicated so called illness and disease, or have they just prolonged the exit, while creating only lower levels of chronic disease, and disease conditions? How about other unrelated chronic illness and autoimmune disease, unrelated to the vaccine targeted pathogen? How about the pubmed listed as well references to the harm of aluminum adjuvants, causing overactivation of the brains microglia and resulting low levels of chronic brain inflammation resulting for repeat multiple vaccines, in some individuals; maybe more individuals and children that we have ever realized? How about the aluminum adjuvant connection to ASD? The studies, and new studies have shown that same brain inflammation to now be found in more and more children and individuals with ASD. And they want to tell us that vaccines have never been scientifically linked in any study, to ASD? Really? How about the MMR vaccine, in which there are actually some similar physiological pathways found in relation to ASD, and also which are in common with heavy metal toxicity, if not overload, in regard to both thimerosal, and aluminum adjuvants. I don’t know about you and what you think, but I think it is not looking good for the claim as to the issue of vaccines doing more good than harm. When will the CD stop living in the dark ages, and dragging their feet as to doing the proper studies? Yet they waste millions chasing the genetic link to ASD, and refuse all other types and forms of real research?

I did pick one specific peer reviewed reference in regard shedding, that I thought was interesting, and a bit troublesome regarding risk. In regard to the shedding of course all they can come up with is to come up with that every last person existing must be vaccinated to protect them against the shedding.

Pertussis infection in fully vaccinated children in day-care centers, Israel.

Abstract

We tested 46 fully vaccinated children in two day-care centers in Israel who were exposed to a fatal case of pertussis infection. Only two of five children who tested positive for Bordetella pertussis met the World Health Organization’s case definition for pertussis. Vaccinated children may be asymptomatic reservoirs for infection.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627963/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627963/pdf/10998384.pdf

Pertussis Vaccine Failure is not Just Modern but Historical: Vaccine has Never Been Effective
http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/pertussis-vaccine-failure-is-not-just-modern-but-historical-vaccine-has-never-been-effective/

Researchers find first US evidence of vaccine-resistant pertussis
http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/researchers-find-first-us-evidence-of-vaccine-resistant-pertussis/

And they tell us the vaccines do not shed? How would this be possible if the vaccines do not shed anything contagious? And they want us to believe that the un-vaccinated are a risk to the vaccinated. Vaccine derived herd relatively and comparatively short term immunity, has never had any actual science behind it; and as to natural long term and/or life time immunity, where as that concept actually makes does sense. So what is the REAL reason they say they need vaccine derived herd immunity? Is it possible that it is more likely due to the issue of vaccine shedding? Now we are getting to some actual understanding of what possibly really goes on.

17 Examples of Admitted Vaccine Failure
http://vactruth.com/2013/02/23/17-examples-of-vaccine-failure/

Article

ECZEMA VACCINATUM

ABSTRACT

Nine cases of eczema vaccinatum are presented, including two fatalities. Seven were caused by contact of a child with eczema with a recently vaccinated sibling.

Suddenly appearing umbilicated vesicles superimposed upon atopic eczema are almost diagnostic of eczema vaccinatum or eczema herpeticum. These do not occur with mere secondary bacterial infection.

Hyperimmune vaccinal gamma-globulin is now available for specific therapy.

Eczema vaccinatum is frequently iatrogenic and uniformly preventable.

The following steps are recommended for prophylaxis: 1) No child with atopic eczema or other skin disorder should be vaccinated. 2) No child should be vaccinated if any member of his family has eczema or other skin disorder. 3) Parents of children with eczema should be notified at the onset of the disease of the danger from vaccination contact. 4) If a sibling of a child with atopic eczema is vaccinated, he must be completely separated from that child for at least 21 days. 5) Forms used by state and local health departments for parents’ consent to vaccination should include an appropriate warning of the contraindications. 6) Eczema vaccinatum should be a reportable disease. 7) Patients recently vaccinated must be excluded from pediatric wards containing patients with atopic eczema, other diseases of the skin, burns or healing surgical incisions. 8) Vaccination may be recommended at 2 months of age, especially for babies from strongly allergic families.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/22/2/259

Acellular pertussis vaccination enhances B. parapertussis colonization

An acellular whooping cough vaccine actually enhances the colonization of Bordetella parapertussis in mice; pointing towards a rise in B. parapertussis incidence resulting from acellular vaccination, which may have contributed to the observed increase in whooping cough over the last decade.

http://www.cidd.psu.edu/research/synopses/acellular-vaccine-enhancement-b.-parapertussi

And rarely are they testing for it nor even knowing understanding what pertussis pathogen strains are there. B parapertussis antigen is not in the current vaccine. And the fear mongering and the recommended boosters continue.

They can admit to the pertussis vaccine failure in Pakistan, but the CDC can not and refuses to admit to that here happening in the US.

Public Health. 2012 Jun;126(6):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

Pertussis resurgence among vaccinated children in Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan.

Mughal A, Kazi YF, Bukhari HA, Ali M.

Source:Diagnostic and Research Centre, Department of Microbiology, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the aetiology of persistent cough among vaccinated children as suspected cases of pertussis in Khairpur District, Sindh, Pakistan. Pertussis or whooping cough, caused by Bordetella pertussis, is re-appearing in many countries despite vaccination coverage. In Khairpur, persistent cough and symptoms similar to pertussis among vaccinated children are common but the aetiology has not been investigated previously.

STUDY DESIGN:

B. pertussis was isolated from cough samples of suspected pertussis patients (n = 700) using the cough plate method with charcoal agar.

METHODS:

Isolation and confirmation of the clinical isolates of B. pertussis was performed by culture on Bordet-Gengou medium, biochemical tests and polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS:

In total, 22 strains of B. pertussis were isolated from clinical cough samples.

CONCLUSION:

To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report of the presence of pertussis in vaccinated children in Khairpur. There is a need for continuous monitoring of pertussis after immunization programmes in order to assess the efficacy of pertussis vaccination.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22445714

And what has the CDC done about it all? They have only continued with their fear mongering and falsely blaming the un-vaccinated. Cocoon tyle vaccinating whole families, and still the outbreaks occur.

The False Theory of Vaccine Derived – Herd Immunity 
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-theory-of-vaccine-derived—herd-immunity.html

———————-

Whooping Cough Epidemic Caused by Virulent New Pertussis Strain—And It’s the Result of Vaccine
http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-10-31/whooping-cough-epidemic-caused-by-virulent-new-pertussis-strain-and-its-the-result-of-vaccine/

Bordetella pertussis Strains with Increased Toxin Production Associated with Pertussis Resurgence (PDF)

Abstract excerpt:

We present evidence that in the Netherlands the dramatic increase in pertussis is temporally associated with the emergence of Bordetella pertussis strains carrying a novel allele for the pertussis toxin promoter, which confers

increased pertussis toxin (Ptx) production. Epidemiologic data suggest that these strains are more virulent in humans. We discuss changes in the ecology of B. pertussis that may have driven this adaptation. Our results underline the importance of Ptx in transmission, suggest that vaccination may select for increased virulence, and indicate ways to control

http://gaia-health.com/articles451/000485-bpertussis.pdf

J Hyg (Lond). 1976 August; 77(1): 85–91.

PMCID: PMC2129724

Prevalent serotypes of Bordetella pertussis in non-vaccinated communities.

Abstract

In many countries, the prevalent serotypes of Bordetella pertussis have changed from a mixture of types 1,2,3 and 1,2 (organisms possessing antigen 2) to a predominance of type 1,3. The timing of the change in different countries is shown to be related to the introduction of mass-vaccination with material rich in antigens 1 and 2 but weak in, or devoid of, antigen 3. In several parts of the world, there have been outbreaks of type 1,3 infection in fully vaccinated children. Non-vaccinated communities in various parts of the world still show the pattern of serotypes which existed elsewhere before mass-vaccination. In order to avoid the disappointments experienced in the past, it is essential that pertussis vaccine for use in previously non-vaccinated communities, like that for any other country, should be rich in each of the three antigens.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2129724/

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Small Mutations in Bordetella pertussis Are Associated with Selective Sweeps

Abstract excerpt:

Our results suggest that the B. pertussis gene repertoire is already well adapted to its current niche and required only fine tuning to persist in the face of vaccination. Further, this work shows that small mutations, even single SNPs, can drive large changes in the populations of bacterial pathogens within a time span of six to 19 years.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0046407

You can not patent vitamin C, as you can an expensive drug or vaccine. Modern medicine is NOT about the actual health of your child, unless it can be done with chemical pharma.

Special Report: The Vitamin C Treatment of Whooping Cough (Pertussis)

http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/12/20/special-report-the-vitamin-c-treatment-of-whooping-cough-suzanne-humphries-md/

Here is what they already knew years ago in the treatment of pertussis.

Can Med Assoc J. 1937 August; 37(2): 134–136.
PMCID: PMC1562195
Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Treatment of Whooping Cough *

Discussion
The short series of cases presented is too small to draw any statistical conclusions, but one fact stands out. Ascorbic acid has a definite efTect in shortening the period of paroxysms from a matter of weeks to a matter of days. We have not checked by cough plates or otherwise in this preliminary work to see whether the infectivity subsides simultaneously with the spasmodic symptoms, but are continuing with a larger series of cases in which these and other tests will be employed.

The dosages used have been empirical, with a tendency to use larger doses early in the disease as our experience of its effects progressed. The acid is available at reasonable prices, and the danger of overdosage seems negligible. Animals have received 2,000 times their estimated requirements without any deleterious effects. Any excess is excreted by the kidneys.

CONCLUSIONS
1. A method has been described for the treatment of whooping cough by ascorbic acid
(vitamin C).
2. Ascorbic acid definitely shortens the paroxysmal stage of the disease, particularly if
relatively

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1562195/?page=3

Pertussis is a bacteria, but either way it is beneficial.

Vitamin C As An Antiviral: It’s All About Dose

http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v05n09.shtml

Vitamin C for Whooping Cough. Updated Edition. Suzanne Humphries, MD
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/09/07/vitamin-c-for-whooping-cough-updated-edition-suzanne-humphries-md/

Why is nobody studying vitamin C in whooping cough? – Conventional medicine’s hypocrisy. by Suzanne Humphries, MD
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/08/03/why-is-nobody-studying-vitamin-c-in-whooping-cough-by-suzanne-humphries-md/

LIPOSOMAL ENCAPSULATED VITAMIN C
http://www.vacfacts.info/anti-viral—liposomal-encapsulated-vitamin-c.html

————————————-

History Repeats Itself: Lessons Vaccinators Refuse to Learn, by Jennifer Craig, PhD
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/04/17/history-repeats-itself-lessons-the-vaccinationists-refuse-to-learn-by-jennifer-craig-phd/

Another below is another example of a failed effort with polio vaccine. It does little good to claim to have eliminated a certain number of previously present cases of polio, while at the same time causing massive cases of polio vaccine derived paralysis. 47,500 new cases. Yet they claim this is NECESSARY, to eradicate polio. They refuse to admit any failure, it seems to me?

Indian J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr-Jun;9(2):114-7.

Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on.

Vashisht N, Puliyel J.

Source:Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Delhi 110054, India.

Abstract

It was hoped that following polio eradication, immunisation could be stopped. However the synthesis of polio virus in 2002, made eradication impossible. It is argued that getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical. Furthermore, while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated. The authors suggest that the huge bill of US$ 8 billion spent on the programme, is a small sum to pay if the world learns to be wary of such vertical programmes in the future.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873

VIDS – Vaccine Induced Diseases
http://www.vaccinesuncensored.org/vids.php

51 035 cases of AFP appear in this document (p 578) for India in 2011, and the in 2011. The figure of 86 638 cases of AFP was listed as globally.

http://www.who.int/wer/wer8650.pdf

VRM: The Re-emergence of Polio in The Third World (compliments of the World Health Organization & Bill Gates)
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=10091

VRM: Weaponized Polio & The African Green Monkey Conundrum
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=10727

Why I choose not to Vaccinate my child
by: Amy Goalen Whittam
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Y2hS7WxS2gU4yXCjuYx84AY60tQc2rGXnTPPWqogOfk

What Is Coming Through That Needle? The Problem of Pathogenic Vaccine Contamination

Benjamin McRearden

http://www.scribd.com/doc/42722540/Vaccine-Contamination-Mcrearden

Mutant Polio Virus Spreads in Nigeria

Experts have long believed epidemics unleashed by a vaccine’s mutated virus wouldn’t last since the vaccine only contains a weakened virus strain – but that assumption is coming under pressure. Some experts now say that once viruses from vaccines start circulating they can become just as dangerous as wild viruses.

“The only difference is that this virus was originally in a vaccine vial,” said Olen Kew, a virologist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The oral polio vaccine used in Nigeria and elsewhere contains a mild version of the live virus. Children who have been vaccinated pass the virus into the water supply through urine or feces. Other children who then play in or drink that water pick up the vaccine’s virus, which gives them some protection against polio.

But in rare instances, as the virus passes through unimmunized children, it can mutate into a strain dangerous enough to ignite new outbreaks, particularly if immunization rates in the rest of the population are low.

Kew said genetic analysis proves mutated viruses from the vaccine have caused at least seven separate outbreaks in Nigeria.

Though Nigeria’s coverage rates have improved, up to 15 percent of children in the north still haven’t been vaccinated against polio. To eradicate the disease, officials need to reach about 95 percent of the population.

Nigeria’s vaccine-linked outbreak underlines the need to stop using the oral polio vaccine as soon as possible, since it can create the very epidemics it was designed to stop, experts say. WHO is researching other vaccines that might work better, but none is on the horizon.

Until a better vaccine is ready, WHO and U.S. CDC officials say the oral vaccine is the best available tool to eradicate polio and that when inoculation rates are nearly 100 percent it works fine.

“Nigeria is almost a case study in what happens when you don’t follow the recommendations,” Kew said.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-204_162-5242168.html

Mutated Polio From Vaccine Is Spreading in Africa

A mutation from a live polio vaccine is stalking Nigeria. In a strange twist of logic, experts are claiming that it mutated as it passed through non-immunized children.

The claim is that children given the live attenuated oral vaccine are properly immunized, but the live virus passes through them and enters local water supplies through their urine or feces. Then, children who have not been immunized pick up the supposedly safe virus by drinking or playing in the water. The weakened virus mutates in them, becoming a new virulent strain.

Why the virus would choose to mutate in non-vaccinated, rather than vaccinated, children is unexplained. Even odder is why the weakened virus would pass through the vaccinated children. If the purpose of a live attenuated vaccination is to force the body to develop antibodies to the virus, then why would live viruses be excreted? Shouldn’t they be killed by the newly-developed antibodies?

Are we being lied to?

This sounds much like the argument that blames nonvaccinated people for disease in those who’ve submitted to innoculations. If the vaccines are effective, then why would the vaccinated be at risk from the unvaccinated?

Are we being lied to?

http://www.gaia-health.com/articles51/000078-Polio-Caused-By-Vaccine.shtml

Nigeria Sees Polio Outbreak from Mutated Vaccine Virus
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/health/july-dec09/polio_08-24.html

Polio in Nigeria Traced to Mutating Vaccine
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/world/africa/11polio.html?_r=0

Mutated virus confirms polio vaccine fears. New Delhi
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1101024/jsp/nation/story_13094132.jsp

Vaccine. 1994 May;12(6):503-7.

Point mutations involved in the attenuation/neurovirulence alternation in type 1 and 2 oral polio vaccine strains detected by site-specific polymerase chain reaction.

We screened for this mutation in five type 1 and nine type 2 polio vaccine-derived strains isolated from vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) cases and in 16 such strains isolated from healthy vaccinees. All 14 strains isolated from VAPP presented the reversion. Of the eight pairs of type 1 isolates from healthy vaccinees, four presented the reversion 3 days after vaccine administration and all but one at 7 days postvaccination. These results support the involvement of the 5′ non-coding specific nucleotide sites in the reversion to neurovirulence of attenuated polio vaccine strains upon multiplication in the human gut

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8036823

Look at the unbelievable statements in the next set of information. So ask, WHY are they using a live and shedding viral vaccine, in these contaminated areas, at all?

Oral Polio Vaccine Circulation and Mutation after Mexican National Immunization Weeks

Conclusion: OPV, primarily serotype 2, was detected in sewage as late as 7 months after an NIW in a Mexican community primarily vaccinated with IPV, but was not detected at 8 months, suggesting that OPV circulation may have ceased.  VAPP mutants were predominantly detected.  This data suggests that in communities with high vaccination rates, one or two years of IPV administration after OPV cessation could be sufficient to prevent outbreaks of paralytic poliomyelitis from vaccine-derived strains.

https://idsa.confex.com/idsa/2011/webprogram/Paper30468.html

Polio vaccine suspected as cause of fatal mutant form of encephalitis

The polio vaccine isn’t protecting children – and, worse, it appears to be causing a new and sometimes fatal form of the disease.

Concerns about the vaccine have arisen following a high number of deaths and hospital admissions from encephalitis and polio in the Uttar Pradesh region of India – where there has been an intensive vaccination programme.

Around 400 children have died, and a further 2,300 admitted to hospital, following an outbreak of a new form of viral encephalitis, and doctors admit they do not know its cause.

http://www.wddty.com/polio-vaccine-suspected-as-cause-of-fatal-mutant-form-of-encephalitis.html

Unvaccinated Blamed for Mutated Polio, (AGAIN ALWAYS FALSELY THE UNVACCINATED ARE BLAMED FOR ANYTHING THAT HAPPENS)

Mutant polio vaccine regains virulence

Excerpts:

But the latest study raises the frightening possibility that the vaccine strain can also regain the ability to spread between people more easily than thought. “It demonstrates clearly that the vaccine virus can spread from person to person,” says Olen Kew from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia.

The outbreak was exacerbated by the fact that Haiti had relaxed its polio vaccination program more than five years earlier. “It’s a warning that you need to have good coverage to prevent vaccines from running away like this,” Kew says.

Total eradication

The study also shows how difficult it will be eliminate polio entirely. For this to be achieved, natural polio would first have to be wiped out through stringent use of the oral polio vaccine. Then all countries could simultaneously stop vaccinating or switch to a different vaccine – injectable, dead polio virus.

This method does not confer as much immunity as the oral vaccine, but it cannot revert to a disease-causing form. This vaccine is already used in the US and much of Europe.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2047-mutant-polio-vaccine-regains-virulence.html

This again points to the claim that they think they need to get 100% vaccine coverage in ever country with existing polio, and only then it may be possible to stop polio, but yet they know they will have the mutations still going on and the result of that is in their minds quite obviously only necessary collateral damage, so to speak. So, as long as they can keep blaming it all on the unvaccinated, which is not exactly proven; it is an assumption. And as long as they keep playing Russian Roulette with the vaccine virus; in the hopes that it does not continue to mutate to a point of becoming a super virus world wide. But in the end, the with the known odds that have been and in the resulting outcomes; clearly it all shows this plan to be not only failing and dangerous; but even currently, is likely causing more harm than good; and will continue to.

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2485-8.

Detection of measles virus RNA in urine specimens from vaccine recipients.

Rota PA, Khan AS, Durigon E, Yuran T, Villamarzo YS, Bellini WJ.

Source: Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

Abstract

Analysis of urine specimens by using reverse transcriptase-PCR was evaluated as a rapid assay to identify individuals infected with measles virus. For the study, daily urine samples were obtained from either 15-month-old children or young adults following measles immunization. Overall, measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period. In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after vaccination. Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination. This assay will enable continued studies of the shedding and transmission of measles virus and, it is hoped, will provide a rapid means to identify measles infection, especially in mild or asymptomatic cases.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494055

You see in the next below link that it ALL depends on who has done the study, as for if they find the evidence of shedding due to a/or the vaccine. Here we have the Journal of Infectious diseases that is closely aligned with pharma and Offit’s CHOP. And they of course find predicable no shedding. Can you imagine the upset if they had, and presented to the CDC with that? Clearly, is not happening.

J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189 Suppl 1:S165-70.

Lack of evidence of measles virus shedding in people with inapparent measles virus infections.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15106106

And here, and again pharma connected

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22983013

So, the pro vaccine side again claims to what? Well if there are no studies to prove that the vaccines cause shedding, then it simply doesn’t happen. Just like in regard to the vaccine aluminum adjuvants; if no studies have ever been done, then we can proclaim that there is no scientific proof of the harm, thus there is no said harm being done.

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Mar;46(3):1101-3. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

Detection of RNA of mumps virus during an outbreak in a population with a high level of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine coverage.

Bitsko RH, Cortese MM, Dayan GH, Rota PA, Lowe L, Iversen SC, Bellini WJ.

Source:Epidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

Abstract

The duration of mumps virus RNA detection was studied during a mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated university population. Seven of the eight reverse transcription-PCR-positive specimens were collected during the first 3 days of parotitis, suggesting that viral shedding is minimal after the first 3 days of symptoms.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184850

However, in three days, you could infect 100′s of people.

General Index: But as you can see, very few actual studies on vaccine shedding have been done.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=shedding%20of%20measles%20vaccine%20mealses

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez

Secondary Transmission: The short and sweet about live virus vaccine shedding.(A short list of the evidence of shedding in regard to each specific vaccine).

http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/

Measles Vaccine Found in Throat of Vaccinated Child
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11858860

Pediatr Dermatol. 2005 Mar-Apr;22(2):130-2.

Vaccine-associated “wild-type” measles.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15804301

Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1995 Jun;37(3):374-6.
Measles encephalomyelitis in a patient with a history of vaccination.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7645392

Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Oct;29(4):855-61.
Measles inclusion-body encephalitis caused by the vaccine strain of measles virus.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10589903

Pediatr Neurol. 1999 May;20(5):399-402.

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis with probable measles vaccine failure.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10371390

I would take my chances with natural infection and recovery, any day; over that of the use of a vaccine, or in this and the most common case, the MMR vaccine..